| |
Savvy Index |
|
2025 |
|
|
| |
predictions |
week |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
rev |
09/04/25 |
|
|
| top 25 |
last week: 75 – 15 season: 79 – 16 |
wins |
losses |
game values |
notes |
| |
Oklahoma St. |
1 |
0 |
14 |
OSU’s defense will probably compete |
| 3 |
Oregon |
1 |
0 |
44 |
but the offense won’t do well. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fresno St. |
1 |
1 |
30 |
Vegas favors Oregon State. I like |
| |
Oregon St. |
0 |
1 |
24 |
OSU also but I agree with Savvy. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
UC Davis |
1 |
0 |
17 |
UC Davis doesn’t look as good on |
| |
Washington |
1 |
0 |
44 |
the field as it did on preseason paper. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
San Diego St. |
1 |
0 |
23 |
WSU is favored by bookies but SDSU |
| |
Washington St. |
1 |
0 |
22 |
has MUCH stronger trends on Savvy. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LA Monroe |
1 |
0 |
10 |
|
| 22 |
Alabama |
0 |
1 |
39 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Lindenwood |
0 |
1 |
12 |
App St. puts up lots and lots of yards but |
| |
App State |
1 |
0 |
44 |
not a commensurate amount of points. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Weber St. |
0 |
1 |
13 |
|
| |
Arizona |
1 |
0 |
42 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Arkansas St. |
1 |
0 |
21 |
|
| |
Arkansas |
1 |
0 |
40 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ball St. |
0 |
1 |
7 |
|
| |
Auburn |
1 |
0 |
45 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
E Washington |
0 |
1 |
10 |
E Washington was surprisingly |
| |
Boise St. |
0 |
1 |
44 |
competitive against Incarnate Word. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
St. Francis PA |
0 |
1 |
6 |
Buffs probably win by more but neither of |
| |
Buffalo |
0 |
1 |
33 |
these outfits impressed in game one. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stanford |
0 |
1 |
14 |
Stanford can’t pass, can’t beat Hawai’i at home |
| 11 |
BYU |
1 |
0 |
36 |
so the Cards won’t beat BYU on the road. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Texas Southern |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
| |
California |
1 |
0 |
40 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
N Carolina |
0 |
1 |
32 |
no betting lines set |
| |
Charlotte |
0 |
1 |
14 |
as of Monday. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bowling Green |
1 |
0 |
23 |
Big upset prediction. Bookies |
| |
Cincinnati |
0 |
1 |
22 |
favor Cincinnati by over 20! |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Troy |
1 |
0 |
14 |
|
| 17 |
Clemson |
0 |
1 |
35 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Charleston S. |
0 |
1 |
7 |
|
| |
Coastal Car |
0 |
1 |
42 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Delaware |
1 |
0 |
17 |
Check out these LBs — Moul of Delaware |
| |
Colorado |
0 |
1 |
37 |
and Hughes of Colorado — 11 tackles each last week! |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
N Colorado |
1 |
0 |
13 |
|
| |
Colorado St. |
0 |
1 |
44 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
Illinois |
1 |
0 |
27 |
|
| 23 |
Duke |
1 |
0 |
24 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Campbell |
0 |
1 |
14 |
|
| |
E Carolina |
0 |
1 |
41 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Long Island |
0 |
1 |
14 |
Each of these teams gave up |
| |
E Michigan |
0 |
1 |
42 |
more than 50 points in week 1. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
USF |
1 |
0 |
24 |
Watch out Gators because USF is the |
| 25 |
Florida |
1 |
0 |
34 |
scariest underdog in FBS. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Florida A&M |
0 |
1 |
14 |
Can FAU lose two in a row to the FCS? |
| |
Florida Atl. |
0 |
1 |
37 |
Last week, FAU threw 62 passes. SIX were intercepted! |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
E Texas A&M |
0 |
1 |
3 |
ETAM looks much improved |
| 19 |
Florida St. |
1 |
0 |
50 |
but so does FSU. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Austin Peay |
1 |
0 |
9 |
Austin Peay is very good in |
| 2 |
Georgia |
1 |
0 |
47 |
FCS but Georgia is an FBS contender. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Memphis |
1 |
0 |
45 |
Oddsmakers set the |
| |
Georgia St. |
0 |
1 |
17 |
spread at just 13.5. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Gardner-Webb |
1 |
0 |
13 |
|
| |
Georgia Tech |
1 |
0 |
45 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sam Houston |
0 |
2 |
24 |
|
| |
Hawai’i |
1 |
1 |
28 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Kennesaw St. |
0 |
1 |
7 |
Neither team impressed |
| |
Indiana |
1 |
0 |
33 |
me in the first games. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
Iowa |
1 |
0 |
17 |
Iowa State will beat the Vegas |
| 8 |
Iowa St. |
2 |
0 |
27 |
spread (2.5) and total points (41.5). |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Liberty |
1 |
0 |
27 |
Both teams underperformed last |
| |
Jacksonville St. |
0 |
1 |
17 |
week but Liberty will revive faster. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Army |
0 |
1 |
24 |
Both of these teams looked awful. |
| |
Kansas St. |
1 |
1 |
36 |
No betting lines set as of Monday. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
Mississippi |
1 |
0 |
38 |
I don’t agree with bookies |
| |
Kentucky |
1 |
0 |
17 |
setting the line at under 10. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
McNeese St. |
1 |
0 |
13 |
|
| |
Louisiana |
0 |
1 |
41 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
James Madison |
1 |
0 |
24 |
|
| |
Louisville |
1 |
0 |
35 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LA Tech |
1 |
0 |
8 |
|
| 16 |
LSU |
1 |
0 |
40 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Missouri State |
0 |
1 |
24 |
Experts set the spread under 10 |
| |
Marshall |
0 |
1 |
40 |
but it will be much higher. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
N Illinois |
1 |
0 |
14 |
Northern Illinois only beat FCS |
| |
Maryland |
1 |
0 |
32 |
Holy Cross by 2 last week. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Bryant |
0 |
1 |
13 |
UMass was a UGE-Mess |
| |
Massachusetts |
0 |
1 |
38 |
against Temple a week ago. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Bethune-Cookman |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Miami better enjoy rolling Cookman because |
| 15 |
Miami Fl |
1 |
0 |
55 |
the path forward is really hard. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Boston Col |
1 |
0 |
30 |
Betting lines say MSU |
| |
Michigan St. |
1 |
0 |
17 |
by 3.5. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
N’western St. |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
| |
Minnesota |
1 |
0 |
49 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Arizona St. |
1 |
0 |
33 |
ASU is 11th-ranked but I don’t think |
| |
Mississippi St. |
1 |
0 |
21 |
this Phoenix bunch is top 25. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Kansas |
2 |
0 |
27 |
Neither of these outfits has |
| 12 |
Missouri |
1 |
0 |
30 |
played a competitive opponent. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
UAB |
1 |
0 |
19 |
Bookies had no prediction |
| |
Navy |
1 |
0 |
45 |
as of Monday. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Akron |
0 |
1 |
7 |
I see some life in Akron so this |
| |
Nebraska |
1 |
0 |
35 |
game might be closer. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Sacramento St. |
0 |
1 |
14 |
Sac State nearly upset FCS title |
| |
Nevada |
0 |
1 |
42 |
contender S Dakota St in week 1. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Idaho St. |
0 |
1 |
20 |
New Mexico made a very strong |
| |
New Mexico |
0 |
1 |
45 |
showing against Michigan. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tulsa |
1 |
0 |
21 |
Vegas says Tulsa will win. |
| |
New Mexico St. |
1 |
0 |
24 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Virginia |
1 |
0 |
21 |
Very high upset |
| |
N Carolina St. |
1 |
0 |
27 |
alert on this one. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
W Illinois |
0 |
1 |
10 |
Western Illinois lost to Illinois |
| |
Northwestern |
0 |
1 |
40 |
last week by 49. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
W Virginia |
1 |
0 |
27 |
This game ranks as the |
| |
Ohio |
0 |
1 |
21 |
most likely upset in week 2. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Grambling St. |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Grambling’s win last week was |
| 1 |
Ohio St. |
1 |
0 |
55 |
against an NAIA opponent. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
Michigan |
1 |
0 |
24 |
Upset prediction. |
| 18 |
Oklahoma |
1 |
0 |
28 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
N Carolina Central |
1 |
1 |
13 |
|
| |
Old Dominion |
0 |
1 |
40 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Florida Intl. |
1 |
0 |
10 |
|
| 4 |
Penn St. |
1 |
0 |
45 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C Michigan |
1 |
0 |
17 |
CMU had a modest upset of San |
| |
Pittsburgh |
1 |
0 |
32 |
Jose State behind terrific defense. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
S Illinois |
0 |
1 |
10 |
|
| |
Purdue |
1 |
0 |
38 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Houston |
1 |
0 |
34 |
Vegas says Houston by 12+. |
| |
Rice |
1 |
0 |
17 |
It will be more. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Miami Oh |
0 |
1 |
14 |
|
| |
Rutgers |
1 |
0 |
28 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Baylor |
0 |
1 |
21 |
Experts say SMU by |
| 13 |
SMU |
1 |
0 |
37 |
3.5 but SMU will top that. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tulane |
1 |
0 |
33 |
|
| |
S Alabama |
1 |
0 |
17 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
S Carolina St |
1 |
0 |
13 |
S Carolina State is a top tier |
| 21 |
S Carolina |
1 |
0 |
41 |
FCS program. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Jackson St. |
1 |
0 |
14 |
Bookies had no prediction |
| |
S Miss |
0 |
1 |
37 |
on this one as of Monday. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Connecticut |
1 |
0 |
24 |
The experts say Syracuse |
| |
Syracuse |
0 |
1 |
39 |
will win by less than 7. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Howard |
1 |
0 |
14 |
Howard upset an FCS (FAU) last |
| |
Temple |
1 |
0 |
41 |
week — not this week. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
E Tennessee St. |
1 |
0 |
7 |
|
| 10 |
Tennessee |
1 |
0 |
49 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
San Jose St. |
0 |
1 |
10 |
Vegas has Texas by |
| 6 |
Texas |
0 |
1 |
35 |
more than 36. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Utah St. |
1 |
0 |
21 |
A&M is a big favorite but I think |
| |
Texas A&M |
1 |
0 |
41 |
Vegas setting the margin at 30+ is a mistake. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Kent St. |
1 |
0 |
6 |
|
| 20 |
Texas Tech |
1 |
0 |
49 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
W Kentucky |
2 |
0 |
34 |
Vegas says Toledo will |
| |
Toledo |
0 |
1 |
24 |
win so this is an upset prediction. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
N Carolina A&T |
0 |
1 |
10 |
UCF sucks at rushing. That is |
| |
UCF |
1 |
0 |
37 |
going to be a big problem in 2025. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
UCLA |
0 |
1 |
24 |
Oddsmakers favor UCLA |
| |
UNLV |
2 |
0 |
30 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Georgia So. |
0 |
1 |
21 |
Clay Helton comes back |
| |
USC |
1 |
0 |
45 |
to the Coliseum. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Cal Poly |
1 |
0 |
0 |
This is literally the battle of qbs … both |
| |
Utah |
1 |
0 |
50 |
qbs lead their teams in passing and rushing. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
Tenn-Martin |
0 |
1 |
17 |
Tenn-Martin gave Oklahoma St all |
| |
UTEP |
0 |
1 |
28 |
it could handle last week. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Texas St. |
1 |
0 |
38 |
Experts favort UTSA but |
| |
UTSA |
0 |
1 |
28 |
Savvy favors future PAC12 Texas St. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Vanderbilt |
1 |
0 |
21 |
. . . but Vandy has better |
| |
Virginia Tech |
0 |
1 |
25 |
trend lines on Savvy Index. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
W Carolina |
0 |
1 |
12 |
Wake Forest could only come up with |
| |
Wake Forest |
1 |
0 |
39 |
one touchdown against Kennessaw last week. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Middle Tenn |
0 |
1 |
7 |
Mid Tenn lost by 20 to |
| |
Wisconsin |
1 |
0 |
35 |
an FCS program in game one. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
N Texas |
1 |
0 |
33 |
…but … WMU looked really tough |
| |
W Michigan |
0 |
1 |
24 |
last week against Michigan State. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCS |
N Iowa |
1 |
0 |
7 |
Wyoming hasn’t been the same since |
| |
Wyoming |
1 |
0 |
38 |
Bohil left. Only 10 points vs Akron last week. |
Savvy Game Line 